statement of the topic
Should we construct a water-storage dam?
introduction of panel members and their intitialposition
Mariko(40): a employee of a spa
Atsushi(50): a politician
Chihiro(63): the chief of our village
Sakiko(27): a member of S.P.C.A.
important points of the discussion as I see it
The problem of water shortage happened two years ago because of little rain, so they are planning to construct a dam. The dam is effective to save water and protect our lives from flooding. However if we do so, we lose some spas and it causes ecological damage.br>
what the outcome was
We will construct a water-strage dam.
my personal opinion
It is impossible to keep the present situation of animals when we construct a dam. However we also protect our lives. We cannot live without water, and government would support people who have to move financially. That's why, I agree with constructing a dam.
how effective the discussion was
Each panelist commented their opinions as their position. Using some figures is good way for us to understand the situation of our town.
how it could have been better
I could not understand the situation of this town, so I want them to explain the background more clearly.
2013年1月16日水曜日
Report3-3
statement of the topic
How we can connect the event and the products?
introduction of panel members and their intitialposition
Riho(50): a fisher
Mai(42): the sponcer of this event
Haruka(24):a participant of this event
Chiaki:a stuff of TV station
important points of the discussion as I see it
They will hold the marathon race for the first time based on the concept of promoting citizens health. They want to gather people from outside of our city and appeal the special products with this event.
what the outcome was
They will make another cource that is 5km, people can walk in the marathon event.
my personal opinion
They hope to hold the event before the marathon event to gather people outside of our city. However, I think it is not need when the perpus of this event is citizens health.
how effective the discussion was
They made effort to answer our questions and opinion.
how it could have been better
I could not understand the main topic, because we had many points we should consider in this discussion. In the end, the outcome didn't mesh with the main topic. They should be more clear up what we discuss.
How we can connect the event and the products?
introduction of panel members and their intitialposition
Riho(50): a fisher
Mai(42): the sponcer of this event
Haruka(24):a participant of this event
Chiaki:a stuff of TV station
important points of the discussion as I see it
They will hold the marathon race for the first time based on the concept of promoting citizens health. They want to gather people from outside of our city and appeal the special products with this event.
what the outcome was
They will make another cource that is 5km, people can walk in the marathon event.
my personal opinion
They hope to hold the event before the marathon event to gather people outside of our city. However, I think it is not need when the perpus of this event is citizens health.
how effective the discussion was
They made effort to answer our questions and opinion.
how it could have been better
I could not understand the main topic, because we had many points we should consider in this discussion. In the end, the outcome didn't mesh with the main topic. They should be more clear up what we discuss.
登録:
投稿 (Atom)