statement of the topic
How we can connect the event and the products?
introduction of panel members and their intitialposition
Riho(50): a fisher
Mai(42): the sponcer of this event
Haruka(24):a participant of this event
Chiaki:a stuff of TV station
important points of the discussion as I see it
They will hold the marathon race for the first time based on the concept of promoting citizens health. They want to gather people from outside of our city and appeal the special products with this event.
what the outcome was
They will make another cource that is 5km, people can walk in the marathon event.
my personal opinion
They hope to hold the event before the marathon event to gather people outside of our city. However, I think it is not need when the perpus of this event is citizens health.
how effective the discussion was
They made effort to answer our questions and opinion.
how it could have been better
I could not understand the main topic, because we had many points we should consider in this discussion. In the end, the outcome didn't mesh with the main topic. They should be more clear up what we discuss.
Thank you Misato,
返信削除I think that under the heading 'How effective the discussion was' there needs to be more information. Simply saying that they made an effort does not say whether that effort was effective in regard to achieving their main goal, which was to reach consensus on their topic.